Everything about Seleucid Kingdom totally explained
Seleucus went as far as
India, where he reached an agreement with
Chandragupta Maurya, in which he exchanged his
eastern territories for a considerable force of 500
war elephants, which were to play a decisive role at
Ipsus:
Westward expansion
Following his and
Lysimachus' victory over
Antigonus Monophthalmus at the
Battle of Ipsus in 301 BC, Seleucus took control over eastern
Anatolia and northern
Syria. In the latter area he founded a new capital at
Antioch on the Orontes, a city he named after his father. An alternative capital was established at
Seleucia on the Tigris, north of Babylon. Seleucus' empire reached its greatest extent following his defeat of his erstwhile ally, Lysimachus, at
Corupedion in 281 BC. Seleucus expanded his control to encompass western Anatolia. He hoped further to take control of Lysimachus' lands in Europe - primarily
Thrace and even
Macedonia itself, but was assassinated by
Ptolemy Ceraunus on landing in Europe. His
son and successor,
Antiochus I Soter, was left with an enormous realm consisting of nearly all of the Asian portions of the Empire, but proved unable to pick up where his father had left off in conquering the European portions of Alexander's empire. His competitors were
Antigonus II Gonatas in Macedonia and
Ptolemy II Philadelphus in
Egypt.
An overextended domain
Nevertheless, even before Seleucus' death, the vast eastern domains of the Seleucids were proving difficult to assert control over. Seleucus invaded
India (modern
Punjab Pakistan) in 305 BC, confronting
Chandragupta Maurya (
Sandrokottos), founder of the
Maurya empire. It is said that Chandragupta fielded an army of 600,000 men and 9,000 war elephants. The two monarchs ultimately sealed a treaty, by which Seleucus ceded vast territories from the
Indus to present-day
Afghanistan. In exchange Chandragupta gave him no less than 500 elephants, an addition to his army that was to play a prominent part in his victory at
Ipsus. The peace was complemented by a "marriage alliance" (
Epigamia in ancient sources), implying either a dynastic alliance (in which a Seleucid princess may have been betrothed to the Maurya dynasty) or the recognition of marriage between Greeks and Indians.
Seleucus also sent an ambassador named
Megasthenes to Chandragupta's court, who repeatedly visited
Pataliputra (modern
Patna in Bihar state), capital of Chandragupta. Megasthenes wrote detailed descriptions of India and Chandragupta's reign, which have been partly preserved to us through
Diodorus Siculus. He also later sent
Deimakos to the court of Chandragupta's son,
Bindusara.
Other territories lost before Seleucus' death were
Gedrosia in the south-east of the Iranian plateau, and, to the north of this,
Arachosia on the west bank of the
Indus River.
Antiochus I (reigned 281-261 BC) and his son and successor
Antiochus II Theos (reigned 261-246 BC) were faced with challenges in the west, including repeated wars with
Ptolemy II and a
Celtic invasion of Asia Minor — distracting attention from holding the eastern portions of the Empire together. Towards the end of Antiochus II's reign, various provinces simultaneously asserted their independence, such as
Bactria under
Diodotus,
Parthia under
Arsaces, and
Cappadocia under
Ariarathes III.
Diodotus, governor for the
Bactrian territory, asserted independence in around 245 BC, although the exact date is far from certain, to form the
Greco-Bactrian kingdom. This kingdom was characterized by a rich
Hellenistic culture, and was to continue its domination of Bactria until around 125 BC, when it was overrun by the invasion of northern nomads. One of the Greco-Bactrian kings,
Demetrius I of Bactria, invaded India around 180 BC to form the
Greco-Indian kingdom, lasting until around AD 20.
The Seleucid satrap of Parthia, named
Andragoras, first claimed independence, in a parallel to the secession of his Bactrian neighbour. Soon after however, a Parthian tribal chief called
Arsaces took over the
Parthian territory around 238 BC to form the
Arsacid Dynasty — the starting point of the powerful
Parthian Empire.
By the time Antiochus II's son
Seleucus II Callinicus came to the throne around 246 BC, the Seleucids seemed to be at a low ebb indeed. Seleucus II was soon dramatically defeated in the
Third Syrian War against
Ptolemy III of Egypt and then had to fight a civil war against his own brother
Antiochus Hierax. Taking advantage of this distraction, Bactria and Parthia seceded from the empire. In Asia Minor too, the Seleucid dynasty seemed to be losing control — Gauls had fully established themselves in
Galatia, semi-independent semi-Hellenized kingdoms had sprung up in
Bithynia,
Pontus, and
Cappadocia, and the city of
Pergamum in the west was asserting its independence under the
Attalid Dynasty.
Revival (223 - 191 BC)
But a revival would begin when Seleucus II's younger son,
Antiochus III the Great, took the throne in 223 BC. Although initially unsuccessful in the
Fourth Syrian War against Egypt, which led to an embarrassing defeat at the
Battle of Raphia (217 BC), Antiochus would prove himself to be the greatest of the Seleucid rulers after Seleucus I himself. Following his defeat at Raphia, he spent the next ten years on his
Anabasis through the eastern parts of his domain — restoring rebellious vassals like Parthia and
Greco-Bactria to at least nominal obedience, and even emulating Alexander with an expedition into India where he met with king
Sophagasenus.
When he returned to the west in 205 BC, Antiochus found that with the death of
Ptolemy IV, the situation now looked propitious for another western campaign.
Antiochus and
Philip V of Macedon then made a compact to divide the Ptolemaic possessions outside of Egypt, and in the
Fifth Syrian War, the Seleucids ousted
Ptolemy V from control of
Coele-Syria. The
Battle of Panium (198 BC) definitively transferred these holdings from the Ptolemies to the Seleucids. Antiochus appeared, at the least, to have restored the Seleucid Kingdom to glory.
Renewed disintegration
But Antiochus' glory wasn't to last for long. Following his erstwhile ally Philip's defeat at the hands of Rome in 197 BC, Antiochus now saw the opportunity for expansion into Greece. Encouraged by the exiled
Carthaginian general
Hannibal, and making an alliance with the disgruntled
Aetolian League, Antiochus invaded Greece. Unfortunately, this decision led to his downfall: he was defeated by the Romans at the
Battle of Thermopylae (191 BC) and
Magnesia (190 BC), and was forced to make peace with the Romans by the embarrassing
Treaty of Apamea (188 BC) — which forced him to abandon all European territories, ceded all of Asia Minor north of the
Taurus Mountains to Pergamum, and set a large indemnity to be paid. Antiochus died in 187 BC on another expedition to the east, where he sought to extract money to pay the indemnity.
The reign of his son and successor
Seleucus IV Philopator (187-175 BC) was largely spent in attempts to pay the large indemnity, and Seleucus was ultimately assassinated by his minister
Heliodorus. Seleucus' younger brother,
Antiochus IV Epiphanes, now seized the throne. He attempted to restore Seleucid prestige with a successful war against Egypt; but despite driving the Egyptian army back to
Alexandria itself, he was forced to withdraw by the Roman envoy
Gaius Popillius Laenas, who famously drew a circle in the sand around the king and told him he'd to decide whether or not to withdraw from Egypt before leaving the circle. Antiochus chose to withdraw.
The latter part of his reign saw the further disintegration of the Empire. The Eastern areas remained nearly uncontrollable, as Parthians began to take over the Persian lands; and Antiochus' aggressive Hellenizing (or de-Judaizing) activities led to armed rebellion in
Judea — the
Maccabee revolt (see the story of Chanukah, Shabbat 21b, Babylonian Talmud). Efforts to deal with both the Parthians and the Jews proved fruitless, and Antiochus himself died during an expedition against the Parthians in 164 BC.
Civil war and further decay
After the death of
Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the Seleucid Empire became increasingly unstable. Frequent civil wars made central authority tenuous at best. Epiphanes' young son,
Antiochus V Eupator, was first overthrown by Seleucus IV's son,
Demetrius I Soter in 161 BC. Demetrius I attempted to restore Seleucid power in
Judea particularly, but was overthrown in 150 BC by
Alexander Balas — an impostor who (with Egyptian backing) claimed to be the son of Epiphanes. Alexander Balas reigned until 145 BC, when he was overthrown by Demetrius I's son,
Demetrius II Nicator. Demetrius II proved unable to control the whole of the kingdom, however. While he ruled
Babylonia and eastern
Syria from
Damascus, the remnants of Balas' supporters — first supporting Balas' son
Antiochus VI, then the usurping general
Diodotus Tryphon — held out in
Antioch.
Meanwhile, the decay of the Empire's territorial possessions continued apace. By 143 BC, the
Jews in form of the
Maccabees had fully established their independence.
Parthian expansion continued as well. In 139 BC, Demetrius II was defeated in battle by the Parthians and was captured. By this time, the entire Iranian Plateau had been lost to Parthian control. Demetrius Nicator's brother,
Antiochus VII, was ultimately able to restore a fleeting unity and vigour to the Seleucid domains, but he too proved unequal to the Parthian threat: he was killed in battle with the Parthians in 129 BC, leading to the final collapse of the Seleucid hold on Babylonia. After the death of Antiochus VII, all effective Seleucid rule collapsed, as multiple claimants contested control of what was left of the Seleucid realm in almost unending civil war.
Collapse (100 - 63 BC)
By 100 BC, the once formidable Seleucid Empire encompassed little more than
Antioch and some Syrian cities. Despite the clear collapse of their power, and the decline of their kingdom around them, nobles continued to play kingmakers on a regular basis, with occasional intervention from
Ptolemaic Egypt and other outside powers. The Seleucids existed solely because no other nation wished to absorb them — seeing as they constituted a useful buffer between their other neighbours. In the wars in Anatolia between
Mithridates VI of
Pontus and
Sulla of Rome, the Seleucids were largely left alone by both major combatants.
Mithridates' ambitious son-in-law,
Tigranes the Great, king of
Armenia, however, saw opportunity for expansion in the constant civil strife to the south. In 83 BC, at the invitation of one of the factions in the interminable civil wars, he invaded Syria, and soon established himself as ruler of Syria, putting Seleucid rule virtually at an end.
Seleucid rule wasn't entirely over, however. Following the Roman general
Lucullus' defeat of both Mithridates and Tigranes in 69 BC, a rump Seleucid kingdom was restored under
Antiochus XIII. Even now, civil wars couldn't be prevented, as another Seleucid,
Philip II, contested rule with Antiochus. After the Roman conquest of Pontus, the Romans became increasingly alarmed at the constant source of instability in Syria under the Seleucids. Once Mithridates was defeated by
Pompey in 63 BC, Pompey set about the task of remaking the Hellenistic East, by creating new client kingdoms and establishing provinces. While client nations like
Armenia and
Judea were allowed to continue some degree of autonomy under local kings, Pompey saw the Seleucids as too troublesome to continue; and doing away with both rival Seleucid princes, he made Syria into a Roman province.
Cultural exchanges
The Seleucid empire's geographic span, from the
Aegean Sea to
Afghanistan, created a melting pot of various peoples, such as
Greeks,
Armenians,
Persians,
Medes,
Jews. The immense size of the empire, followed by its encompassing nature, made the Seleucid rulers have a governing interest in implementing a policy of racial unity initiated by Alexander. The
Hellenization of the Seleucid empire was achieved by the establishment of Greek cities throughout the empire. Historically significant towns and cities, such as
Antioch, were created or renamed with more appropriate
Greek names. The creation of new
Greek cities and towns was aided by the fact that the Greek mainland was overpopulated and therefore made the vast Seleucid empire ripe for colonization. Colonization was used to further Greek interest while facilitating the assimilation of many native groups. Socially, this led to the adoption of Greek practices and customs by the educated native classes in order to further themselves in public life and the ruling
Macedonian class gradually adopted some of the local traditions. By 313 BC, Hellenic ideas had begun their almost 250-year expansion into the Near East, Middle East, and Central Asian cultures. It was the empire's governmental framework to rule by establishing hundreds of cities for trade and occupational purposes. Many of the existing cities began — or were compelled by force — to adopt Hellenized philosophic thought, religious sentiments, and politics. Synthesizing Hellenic and indigenous cultural, religious, and philosophical ideas met with varying degrees of success — resulting in times of simultaneous peace and rebellion in various parts of the empire. Such was the case with the Jewish population of the Seleucid empire because the Jews posed a significant problem which eventually led to war. Contrary to the accepting nature of the
Ptolemaic empire towards native religions and customs, the Seleucids gradually tried to force Hellenization upon the Jewish people in their territory by outlawing Judaism. This eventually led to the revolt of the Jews under Seleucid control, which would later lead to the Jews achieving independence.
Seleucid Military
As with many of the Hellenistic states that formed after the death of Alexander the Great, the Seleucid armies were based on the Macedonian model and its troops were primarily of Greco-Macedonian origin. Since the Seleucid realm covered much of the eastern portions of the former Persian Empire, its kings had to rely on Eastern people to man its army. They relied on troops that used the Macedonian phalanx, archers from the Eastern peoples and cavalry. Also, the Seleucids had a supply of Indian war elephants which was used to cause fear amongst their enemies. Like the Ptolemies with their wealth, the Seleucid kings had managed to recruit all kinds of people as mercenaries from the Indians living on the Indus to the people of Crete and Galatia. With their wars against Rome, the Seleucids attempted to create units of troops that copied the Roman legions. By 63 BC, the Seleucid Empire along with its army had disbanded. Many of the heavy cavalry was rumored to join the Roman armies in Asia.
Seleucid rulers
Further Information
Get more info on 'Seleucid Kingdom'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://seleucid_empire.totallyexplained.com">Seleucid Empire Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |